News

Proven in the Field: ATMIS Flex Static Multispectral Camouflage

British Army Trials with Armoured Cavalry and Engineer Units

The ability to establish a concealed position quickly is no longer a tactical advantage, it is a survivability requirement. Persistent surveillance, multispectral sensors, and rapid targeting cycles have transformed the threat environment for static positions across the battlespace. Command posts, vehicle hides, logistic nodes, and engineering tasks are all at risk during the critical window when camouflage is being erected.

Operational trials with British Army Armoured Cavalry and Engineer units assessed ATMIS Flex Static Multispectral Camouflage Systems under realistic field conditions. The results were clear.

The Challenge

Traditional static camouflage systems frequently require multiple layers to achieve combined visual and thermal protection. They are time consuming to deploy, manpower intensive, and difficult to manage around vehicles, equipment, and uneven terrain. The window between arriving at a position and achieving effective concealment is precisely when forces are most exposed.

Modern ISR capabilities have closed the margin for slow or incomplete concealment. Forces need a solution that deploys fast, delivers multispectral protection in a single layer, and allows operations to continue beneath it without compromise.

The Solution

ATMIS Flex Static Systems are designed around that requirement. A single integrated layer provides multispectral protection across visual and infrared environments, deployable rapidly by small teams with minimal equipment.

Key capabilities include rapid deployment over vehicles, equipment, and personnel; reduced snagging on vehicle armour and engineering assets; effective stand off to support thermal management and ventilation; and compact storage for field transport and redeployment.

“The ATMIS camouflage system was unanimously preferred over the in service system. It was significantly more user friendly, quicker to deploy, easier to collapse, and simpler to store.” — British Army Engineer Unit Trial Feedback

Operational Results

Trials across Armoured Cavalry and Engineer units demonstrated consistent, measurable improvements for static concealment tasks.

Platforms and equipment were camouflaged in significantly less time than with legacy systems, directly reducing exposure during position establishment. Personnel were able to conduct digging in, administration, and preparation under both visual and thermal protection from the outset, not after a prolonged setup phase.

“The system provided full visual and thermal protection for vehicles and troops operating beneath it, allowing preparation and administration to continue while concealed.” — Armoured Unit Operational Trial Feedback

Fewer personnel were required to deploy and recover the system, freeing others for security and operational tasks. The system effectively broke up platform signatures and reduced detectability from observation points and elevated vantage positions throughout the trial period.

What Commanders and Users Said

Operational commanders assessed ATMIS Flex as significantly improving survivability for static positions and strongly preferred it over legacy systems. Users reported the system was easier to deploy, handle, and stow, with reduced snagging across vehicle equipment and engineering assets. Trial observations confirmed effective visual and thermal protection for vehicles and personnel, with activity continuing beneath the system throughout.

Where It Applies

ATMIS Flex Static Systems are suitable across a wide range of static position tasks: vehicle hides, command posts, defensive positions, engineering worksites, logistic nodes, forward operating bases, and training environments.

Part of an Integrated Survivability Approach

ATMIS Flex is a key component of Integrated Survivability, enabling forces to reduce detection, delay targeting, and maintain operational effectiveness in contested environments. In a battlespace where the window between arrival and concealment determines survivability, speed of deployment is not a convenience. It is a tactical necessity.